UNIT-3 ADR

UNIT-3

Table of Contents

Question-1 Define Arbitration Agreement and discuss the effect of death of parties on Arbitration Agreement.

Arbitration Agreement: Definition and Overview

An Arbitration Agreement is a legally binding contract between parties to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than litigation. It can be a separate agreement or a clause within a contract. According to Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (India), an arbitration agreement is defined as:

“An agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.”

Key Features of an Arbitration Agreement:

  1. Agreement to Arbitrate: Parties mutually agree to resolve disputes through arbitration instead of approaching courts.
  2. Scope of Disputes: The agreement specifies the types of disputes that will be referred to arbitration.
  3. Defined Legal Relationship: It governs disputes arising out of a pre-existing legal relationship, which may or may not be contractual.
  4. Written Form: The agreement must be in writing as per Section 7(3) of the Act, ensuring its enforceability.
  5. Independence: It is separate from the main contract, meaning even if the contract is invalid, the arbitration clause may survive (Doctrine of Severability).

Death of Parties and its Effect on Arbitration Agreement

The death of a party to an arbitration agreement can raise significant legal questions about the enforceability and continuation of the arbitration proceedings. Indian law, as well as international arbitration principles, provides clarity on this issue.

Effect of Death on Arbitration Agreement

  1. Survival of Arbitration Agreement:
    • As per Section 40(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitration agreement does not become invalid upon the death of a party. The agreement is binding on the legal representatives of the deceased.
    • The principle underlying this provision is that arbitration agreements are rights in personam but are transferable upon death to the deceased’s successors or representatives.
  2. Legal Representatives’ Role:
    • The legal representatives of the deceased step into the shoes of the deceased party and assume their rights and obligations under the arbitration agreement.
    • They are entitled to participate in ongoing arbitration proceedings or initiate arbitration if disputes arise after the death of the original party.
  3. Exceptions:
    • If the arbitration agreement explicitly provides that it shall terminate upon the death of a party, it will not survive.
    • If the dispute involves personal obligations of the deceased that cannot be performed or transferred (e.g., personal service contracts), the arbitration agreement may terminate.
  4. Continuation of Proceedings:
    • If arbitration proceedings have already commenced, the death of a party does not terminate the proceedings. The arbitrator may proceed after allowing the legal representatives to join as parties.

Relevant Case Law:

  1. Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr. (2003):
    • The Supreme Court of India held that an arbitration agreement binds legal representatives unless the agreement is personal in nature or explicitly states otherwise.
  2. Ram Charan Das v. Girija Nandini Devi (1965):
    • The Court ruled that unless the obligations under a contract or arbitration agreement are purely personal, they are enforceable against the successors of the deceased party.
  3. Prabhat General Agencies v. Union of India (1971):
    • The Delhi High Court clarified that the death of a party does not affect the validity of an arbitration clause unless specifically agreed by the parties.

Practical Implications:

  1. Pending Proceedings:
    • Arbitration proceedings can continue with the substitution of the deceased party’s legal representatives. The arbitrator has the discretion to grant time for such substitution.
  2. Initiation of Arbitration:
    • Legal representatives of a deceased party may invoke the arbitration clause to resolve disputes that arose before the death.
  3. Personal Obligations:
    • If the arbitration agreement pertains to obligations that are personal in nature (e.g., artistic services, consultancy services based on personal expertise), the agreement may lapse upon death.
  4. Jurisdictional Challenges:
    • Legal representatives may challenge the arbitrator’s jurisdiction if the arbitration clause does not expressly bind successors.

Conclusion

An arbitration agreement is generally considered a transferable right that survives the death of a party. It ensures the continuity of dispute resolution mechanisms, promoting efficiency and finality. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, along with judicial interpretations, ensures that arbitration agreements bind successors unless explicitly stated otherwise or when the obligations are personal in nature. The role of legal representatives is critical in ensuring the seamless continuation or initiation of arbitration proceedings.

An arbitral award is the final decision rendered by an arbitrator or arbitral tribunal in resolving disputes between the parties. While arbitration is intended to provide a binding resolution with minimal judicial intervention, legal systems recognize the need for recourse in cases where awards may be flawed due to procedural or substantive issues.

In India, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act), which is based on the UNCITRAL Model Law, governs the process of challenging arbitral awards. The primary recourse against an arbitral award is provided under Section 34 of the Act.

Grounds for Challenging an Arbitral Award

Under Section 34(2), an arbitral award can be challenged on the following grounds:

1. Invalidity of Arbitration Agreement

  • If the arbitration agreement was not valid under the law agreed upon by the parties or under the law in force in India.

2. Lack of Proper Notice

  • If a party was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or the arbitral proceedings, or was otherwise unable to present their case.

3. Excess of Jurisdiction

  • If the award deals with disputes not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the arbitration agreement, or it contains decisions beyond the scope of the agreement.

4. Illegality or Contravention of Public Policy

  • An award can be set aside if it is in conflict with the public policy of India. The 2015 and 2019 amendments to the Act clarified the scope of public policy to include:
    • Fraud or corruption in the award.
    • Violation of fundamental policy of Indian law.
    • Contravention of the most basic notions of justice or morality.

5. Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter

  • If the dispute resolved by the arbitrator was not arbitrable under Indian law.

6. Defects in the Award

  • If the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, or if the award was improperly delivered (e.g., unsigned or without reasoning).

Procedure for Challenging an Arbitral Award

1. Time Limit

  • A party must file an application to set aside the award within three months of receiving the award. An additional 30-day extension may be granted by the court for sufficient cause (Section 34(3)).

2. Competent Court

  • The application to set aside the award must be filed before a court of competent jurisdiction, typically a principal civil court or High Court depending on the nature and location of the dispute.

3. Burden of Proof

  • The party challenging the award bears the burden of proving the grounds for setting aside the award.

Limited Scope of Judicial Review

Indian courts generally refrain from re-examining the merits of the case while reviewing arbitral awards, adhering to the principle of minimal judicial intervention (Section 5). However, there are exceptions in cases of procedural violations or gross miscarriage of justice.

Appeals Against Court Orders

Under Section 37, appeals can be made against certain orders of the court, including:

  1. An order setting aside or refusing to set aside an arbitral award.
  2. An order refusing to refer parties to arbitration under Section 8.
  3. Orders concerning interim measures under Section 9.

Enforcement of Arbitral Award and Stay

  • An arbitral award is enforceable as a decree of the court (Section 36).
  • If a challenge is filed under Section 34, the award’s enforcement may be stayed by the court, usually upon the provision of adequate security by the applicant.

Judicial Precedents

1. ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003):

  • The Supreme Court expanded the definition of public policy to include errors of law and violations of Indian law, making it easier to challenge awards.

2. Venture Global Engineering v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. (2008):

  • The Court emphasized that arbitral awards conflicting with public policy could be set aside.

3. Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI (2019):

  • The Supreme Court restricted the scope of “public policy” and reaffirmed that courts should not interfere with arbitral awards unless there is a fundamental legal or procedural flaw.
  1. Correcting Errors: Provides an opportunity to rectify procedural or substantive errors in the award.
  2. Ensures Fairness: Protects parties from awards tainted by bias, corruption, or procedural irregularities.
  3. Adherence to Law: Ensures that the arbitration process complies with Indian law and principles of natural justice.
  1. Delays: Challenges under Section 34 can significantly delay the enforcement of awards, undermining the efficiency of arbitration.
  2. Judicial Overreach: Despite legislative intent to limit interference, courts sometimes scrutinize the merits of the award.
  3. Costs: Legal challenges can be expensive, negating arbitration’s cost-effectiveness.

Suggestions for Effective Recourse

  1. Time-Bound Disposal:
    • Courts should adhere to strict timelines for disposing of Section 34 applications.
  2. Limited Judicial Intervention:
    • Courts should focus solely on procedural and jurisdictional errors, avoiding review of merits.
  3. Streamlined Procedures:
    • Uniform and simplified procedures for challenging arbitral awards can reduce delays.
  4. Awareness Among Arbitrators:
    • Arbitrators should ensure compliance with procedural fairness and substantive law to minimize grounds for challenge.

Conclusion

Legal recourse against arbitral awards ensures the integrity of the arbitration process by providing a safeguard against flawed decisions. While the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, aims to strike a balance between finality of awards and fairness to parties, challenges under Section 34 must be limited to cases of genuine procedural or legal defects to maintain arbitration’s efficiency and reliability. Judicial intervention should be minimal, and procedural safeguards must be upheld to reinforce trust in the arbitral process.

QUESTION-3- Explain any two of the following: ( ) Arbitration (il) Arbitration Agreement (ini) International Commercial Arbitration

1. Arbitration

Definition:
Arbitration is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) where disputes are resolved outside the traditional court system by one or more arbitrators chosen by the parties. The arbitrator’s decision, known as the arbitral award, is legally binding and enforceable in the same manner as a court decree. Arbitration is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in India.

Key Features of Arbitration:

  1. Private Process: Arbitration is conducted in a private setting, offering confidentiality.
  2. Binding Decision: The arbitral award is final and enforceable, subject to limited grounds for challenge under Section 34 of the Act.
  3. Flexibility: Parties can decide the procedure, arbitrators, and even the location of arbitration.
  4. Neutral Forum: Ensures a neutral forum, particularly in international disputes.

Advantages of Arbitration:

  1. Speedier resolution compared to courts.
  2. Cost-effective for complex commercial disputes.
  3. Ensures confidentiality, which is crucial in commercial matters.
  4. Parties retain control over the choice of arbitrator and procedural rules.

Disadvantages of Arbitration:

  1. Limited avenues for appeal or review of arbitral awards.
  2. Costs can escalate if the process becomes protracted.
  3. Possible imbalance of power if one party dominates the arbitration agreement drafting.

Legislative Framework in India:

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: The Act consolidates and amends laws relating to domestic arbitration, international arbitration, and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
  • Key Sections:
    • Section 7: Defines an arbitration agreement.
    • Section 11: Deals with the appointment of arbitrators.
    • Section 34: Grounds for challenging an arbitral award.

Notable Case Law:

  • Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc. (2012): Reaffirmed the principle of minimal judicial intervention in arbitral proceedings.
  • Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI (2019): Clarified the interpretation of “public policy” for setting aside an arbitral award.

2. Arbitration Agreement

Definition:
An arbitration agreement is the foundation of arbitration. It is an agreement between the parties to submit their present or future disputes to arbitration. Under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitration agreement must be in writing and reflect the intention of the parties to arbitrate their disputes.

Essential Elements of an Arbitration Agreement:

  1. Written Agreement: As per Section 7(4), an agreement may be in the form of:
    • A clause in a contract.
    • A separate document.
  2. Consensus Ad Idem: Parties must have a mutual intention to resolve disputes through arbitration.
  3. Arbitrable Disputes: The agreement must cover disputes capable of being resolved through arbitration.
  4. Valid Agreement: The agreement must not be void under general contract law principles (e.g., due to fraud or coercion).

Form of Arbitration Agreement:

  • A standalone arbitration clause in a broader commercial contract.
  • A separate agreement signed by both parties.

Scope and Applicability:

  • Covers both domestic and international arbitration.
  • Disputes must fall within the scope of the arbitration clause.
  • Section 8: Parties are obligated to refer disputes to arbitration if an arbitration agreement exists.
  • Section 11: Discusses the appointment of arbitrators when the agreement lacks specifics.

Case Law:

  • K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi (1998): Explained the requirements of a valid arbitration agreement, including clarity and the intention to arbitrate.
  • Enercon (India) Ltd. v. Enercon GMBH (2014): Reiterated that arbitration agreements should be interpreted to uphold arbitration wherever possible.

3. International Commercial Arbitration

Definition:
International Commercial Arbitration refers to arbitration where at least one of the parties is a foreign national or a company, and the dispute involves cross-border commercial transactions. It is governed by Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which deals with the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the New York Convention or Geneva Convention.

Key Features:

  1. Cross-Border Element: At least one party must be foreign or the transaction should involve multiple jurisdictions.
  2. Neutral Forum: Parties often choose neutral arbitrators or forums to avoid local bias.
  3. Governing Law: Parties can agree on the procedural and substantive law to be applied.
  • Part I of the Act governs international arbitrations conducted in India.
  • Part II addresses enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.
  • Section 2(1)(f) defines international commercial arbitration.

Advantages:

  1. Provides a neutral forum for resolving cross-border disputes.
  2. Ensures enforceability of awards in multiple jurisdictions under international treaties.

Case Law:

  • Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1994): Established principles for enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in India.
  • NTPC v. Singer Company (1992): Discussed the determination of the seat of arbitration in international disputes.

QUESTION -4-What are the grounds for taking recourse against arbitral award ? When does arbitral award becomefinal?

Grounds for Taking Recourse Against an Arbitral Award

The grounds for challenging an arbitral award in India are provided under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. These grounds are limited to ensure minimal judicial intervention and maintain the efficiency of arbitration. A party seeking recourse against an arbitral award can apply to the court for setting aside the award based on the following:

1. Incapacity of a Party (Section 34(2)(a)(i))

  • If a party to the arbitration agreement was under some incapacity (e.g., minor or mentally incapacitated), the award can be challenged.

2. Invalid Arbitration Agreement (Section 34(2)(a)(ii))

  • The arbitration agreement must be valid under the law governing the agreement. If it is void due to fraud, misrepresentation, or lack of proper execution, the award may be set aside.

3. Lack of Proper Notice (Section 34(2)(a)(iii))

  • If a party was not given proper notice of the arbitration proceedings or the appointment of the arbitrator, or was otherwise unable to present their case, the award can be challenged.

4. Beyond the Scope of Arbitration (Section 34(2)(a)(iv))

  • If the award contains decisions on matters not contemplated or falling beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement, those parts of the award can be set aside.

5. Procedural Irregularities (Section 34(2)(a)(v))

  • If the arbitral tribunal or the proceedings did not comply with the agreed procedure, the award can be challenged.

6. Conflict with Public Policy of India (Section 34(2)(b)(ii))

  • An arbitral award can be set aside if it is contrary to the public policy of India, which includes:
    • Fraud or corruption in the making of the award.
    • Violation of the fundamental policy of Indian law.
    • Conflict with the most basic notions of justice or morality.
    In Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI (2019), the Supreme Court clarified the scope of public policy, narrowing it to avoid unnecessary interference.

7. Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter (Section 34(2)(b)(i))

  • If the subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement through arbitration under Indian law, the award can be set aside.

8. Improper Composition of Tribunal (Section 34(2)(a)(v))

  • If the arbitral tribunal was not constituted in accordance with the arbitration agreement, the award is subject to challenge.

Time Limit for Filing an Application

  • As per Section 34(3), an application for setting aside an arbitral award must be made within three months from the date the party receives the arbitral award. This period can be extended by an additional 30 days if sufficient cause is shown.

When Does an Arbitral Award Become Final?

The arbitral award becomes final under the following conditions:

1. No Challenge Within the Time Limit

  • If no application for setting aside the arbitral award is made within the prescribed time under Section 34(3), the award becomes final and binding on the parties.

2. Rejection of Challenge

  • If an application under Section 34 to set aside the arbitral award is rejected by the court, the award becomes final and enforceable.

3. Finality Under Section 35

  • Section 35 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act states that an arbitral award is binding on the parties and those claiming under them unless it is set aside under Section 34.

4. Enforcement

  • Once the arbitral award becomes final, it can be enforced as a decree of the court under Section 36, provided no stay is granted by the court during the pendency of a challenge.

Relevant Case Law

  1. ONGC v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): Expanded the scope of “public policy” to include patent illegality as a ground for setting aside an award.
  2. Fiza Developers v. AMCI (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2009): Clarified the procedural aspects for challenging an arbitral award.
  3. Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI (2019): Narrowed the interpretation of public policy to ensure minimal judicial interference.

Conclusion

The legal framework governing recourse against arbitral awards aims to strike a balance between respecting the autonomy of arbitration and providing a safety net for addressing genuine grievances. The finality of an arbitral award ensures the efficiency and certainty of the arbitration process, making it a preferred mechanism for dispute resolution in India.

QUESTION-5- Define Arbitration. Discuss in detail the kinds ofArbitratio

Definition of Arbitration

Arbitration is a method of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) where parties agree to resolve their disputes outside the court system through an impartial arbitrator or arbitral tribunal. The arbitrator’s decision, known as an arbitral award, is binding on the parties. Arbitration is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in India, which incorporates provisions based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1985.

Key Features of Arbitration

  1. Voluntary Process: Both parties must consent to arbitration, typically through an arbitration agreement.
  2. Neutral Arbitrator: A third-party arbitrator or tribunal is appointed to resolve the dispute impartially.
  3. Binding Decision: The arbitral award is final and enforceable as a decree of the court.
  4. Confidentiality: Proceedings are conducted privately.

Kinds of Arbitration

Arbitration can be categorized based on the nature of the dispute, the parties involved, and the procedural framework. Below are the key types:

1. Domestic Arbitration

  • Definition: Disputes arising between parties domiciled or carrying out business in India, governed by Indian laws.
  • Example: A contractual dispute between two Indian companies.

2. International Arbitration

  • Definition: Disputes where at least one party is domiciled outside India.
  • Governed by Part I and Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, depending on the nature of the arbitration agreement.
  • Example: A dispute between an Indian company and a foreign supplier.

3. Institutional Arbitration

  • Definition: Arbitration administered by a specialized institution with pre-established rules.
  • Examples of institutions:
    • Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA)
    • Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
    • International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  • Advantages:
    • Structured rules.
    • Administrative support.
    • Professional arbitrators.
  • Disadvantages: Can be costlier than ad hoc arbitration.

4. Ad Hoc Arbitration

  • Definition: Parties decide the procedures and rules without institutional involvement.
  • Advantages:
    • Flexibility in procedure.
    • Cost-efficient if conducted properly.
  • Disadvantages: Risk of delays and inefficiency without proper guidelines.

5. Statutory Arbitration

  • Definition: Arbitration mandated by specific statutes.
  • Example:
    • Disputes under the Railways Act, 1989.
    • Disputes under the Co-operative Societies Act.
  • Characteristics: Parties do not have the choice to avoid arbitration if the law applies.

6. Fast-Track Arbitration

  • Definition: A simplified and expedited arbitration process to resolve disputes quickly.
  • Governed by Section 29B of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • Example: Dispute resolved within 6 months by limiting the evidence and hearing process.

7. Online Arbitration

  • Definition: Arbitration conducted electronically using online platforms for filing, hearings, and communication.
  • Emerging due to advancements in technology and need for cost-effective dispute resolution.
  • Advantages:
    • Saves time and travel costs.
    • Ideal for cross-border disputes.

8. Foreign Arbitration

  • Definition: Arbitration conducted outside India, even if the dispute involves an Indian party.
  • Governed by Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which deals with enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under conventions like the New York Convention and the Geneva Convention.

9. Med-Arb

  • Definition: A hybrid method combining mediation and arbitration.
  • Initially, the dispute is mediated; if unsuccessful, the process transitions to arbitration for a binding decision.

10. Conciliation-Based Arbitration

  • A process where parties are encouraged to settle disputes amicably through conciliation before proceeding to arbitration.
  1. Arbitration Agreement: Defined under Section 7 of the Act as an agreement to submit disputes to arbitration.
  2. Appointment of Arbitrators: Governed by Section 11, which specifies the procedure for appointment.
  3. Powers of Arbitrators: Specified under Section 19, arbitrators are not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure or Evidence Act.
  4. Fast-Track Arbitration: Governed under Section 29B, which allows for expedited resolution.

Case Laws

  1. Bharat Aluminum Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum Technical Services (2012)
    • Distinguished the applicability of Parts I and II of the Act, particularly for international arbitration.
  2. Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. v. NHAI (2019)
    • Clarified the scope of “public policy” when challenging arbitral awards.
  3. Shree Ram Mills Ltd. v. Utility Premises Pvt. Ltd. (2007)
    • Highlighted the procedural flexibility of ad hoc arbitration.

Conclusion

Arbitration provides a flexible, efficient, and binding method for resolving disputes. The choice between different kinds of arbitration depends on factors such as the nature of the dispute, the relationship between parties, and the need for speed and cost-effectiveness. Institutional arbitration is preferred for structured disputes, while ad hoc arbitration is suitable for simpler cases. Fast-track and online arbitration are increasingly significant due to their efficiency and adaptability to modern needs.

QUESTION -6- Explain the following: (a) Grounds for challenge (b)Administrative Assistance (c) Termination ofProceeding.

(a) Grounds for Challenge

The grounds for challenge in arbitration refer to specific reasons for questioning the appointment or impartiality of an arbitrator or the validity of an arbitral award. These are governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in India.

1. Grounds for Challenging an Arbitrator

An arbitrator can be challenged under Section 12 and Section 13 of the Act.
Key grounds include:

  • Bias or Lack of Independence: If there are circumstances giving rise to justifiable doubts as to the arbitrator’s impartiality or independence (Section 12(3)).
    • Example: Financial or personal relationship with one of the parties.
  • Lack of Qualification: If the arbitrator does not possess the qualifications agreed upon by the parties.
    • Example: Disputes requiring technical expertise where the arbitrator lacks the requisite knowledge.
  • Conflict of Interest: Listed in the Fifth Schedule and Seventh Schedule of the Act, including relationships or interests that impair impartiality.

2. Grounds for Challenging an Arbitral Award

An arbitral award can be challenged under Section 34, typically in a court, based on:

  • Public Policy: If the award is contrary to the public policy of India, which includes:
    • Fraud or corruption during proceedings.
    • Violation of fundamental legal principles.
  • Incapacity of Parties: If the agreement is void due to lack of legal capacity.
  • Improper Notice: Failure to provide proper notice of the arbitration or inability to present one’s case.
  • Excess of Authority: If the award deals with matters beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement.
  • Non-Arbitrable Issues: Disputes involving criminal or matrimonial matters are not arbitrable.

(b) Administrative Assistance

Administrative assistance refers to the support provided to ensure smooth arbitration proceedings, often facilitated by arbitration institutions or administrative bodies.

1. Role of Administrative Assistance

  • Organizing Hearings: Scheduling and arranging meetings and hearings between the parties and the arbitrator.
  • Documentation Management: Managing the submission, storage, and retrieval of documents and evidence.
  • Financial Management: Collecting fees, maintaining accounts, and managing financial aspects of the arbitration.
  • Communication Support: Facilitating correspondence between parties and the tribunal.

2. Examples

  • Institutional arbitration bodies like the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) or Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) provide detailed administrative assistance.
  • In India, institutions like the Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA) handle administrative tasks.

Advantages

  • Efficiency: Reduces procedural delays by ensuring timely communication.
  • Neutrality: Ensures impartial handling of logistical issues.

Administrative assistance may be explicitly agreed upon in the arbitration agreement or inferred from the rules of the arbitral institution chosen by the parties.

(c) Termination of Proceedings

Termination of arbitration proceedings refers to the formal conclusion of the arbitration process, governed by Section 32 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1. Modes of Termination

  • Final Arbitral Award: The proceedings terminate when the arbitrator renders a binding and enforceable award resolving the dispute (Section 32(1)).
  • Withdrawal of Claim: If the claimant withdraws the claim, and the respondent does not object, the proceedings terminate.
  • Mutual Agreement: If both parties agree to terminate the proceedings before the award.
  • Impossibility: When the arbitral tribunal finds that continuation of the proceedings is unnecessary or impossible.

2. Consequences of Termination

  • The tribunal’s mandate ends upon termination, except for ancillary functions like correcting errors in the award or addressing costs.
  • Post-Termination Functions:
    • Correction of errors in the award (Section 33).
    • Interpretation of specific portions of the award, if sought by a party.
  • Section 32(2) specifies that proceedings can be terminated by a tribunal’s order when:
    • The parties settle the dispute.
    • The claimant withdraws the claim.
    • It becomes impossible or unnecessary to continue.

Case Law

  • Union of India v. Popular Construction Co. (2001): Explained the process of finality of an arbitral award and emphasized adherence to time limits post-termination.

Conclusion

Each of these aspects—grounds for challenge, administrative assistance, and termination of proceedings—plays a critical role in ensuring the arbitration process is impartial, efficient, and fair. The provisions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, serve as a comprehensive framework to address these elements and ensure procedural integrity.

QUESTION -7-What do you mean by arbitral award ?On what ground an award could be challenged ?

Arbitral Award: Meaning and Grounds for Challenge

What is an Arbitral Award?

An arbitral award is the final decision delivered by an arbitral tribunal to resolve a dispute between parties involved in arbitration. It is similar to a court judgment but is binding and enforceable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in India.

Key Features of an Arbitral Award

  1. Binding Nature: The award is legally binding on the parties.
  2. Finality: Unless challenged successfully under specific grounds, the award is conclusive.
  3. Contents of an Award (Section 31):
    • Must be in writing and signed by the arbitrators.
    • Include the reasons upon which it is based unless the parties agree otherwise.
    • Specify the date and place of arbitration.
    • Provide for the allocation of costs between the parties.

Types of Arbitral Awards

  1. Interim Award: Provisional decisions addressing certain issues in the dispute.
  2. Final Award: Resolves all the issues in the arbitration and concludes the proceedings.

Grounds for Challenging an Arbitral Award

The grounds for challenging an arbitral award are set out in Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. An application for setting aside the award can be made to a competent court within three months of receiving the award.

1. Invalid Arbitration Agreement

  • The arbitration agreement must be valid under the law.
  • If the agreement is found to be void or unenforceable, the award can be challenged.

2. Incapacity of Parties

  • If a party to the arbitration was under some legal incapacity (e.g., a minor or mentally incapacitated person), the award may be set aside.

3. Improper Notice or Inability to Present Case

  • If the party was not given proper notice of the arbitration proceedings or was unable to present its case.

4. Arbitrator Exceeding Authority

  • The award can be challenged if it deals with disputes not contemplated by the arbitration agreement or exceeds the scope of arbitration.

5. Procedural Irregularity

  • If the procedure adopted by the tribunal was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties or statutory requirements.

6. Award Contrary to Public Policy

  • The concept of “public policy” includes:
    • Award induced by fraud or corruption.
    • Violations of fundamental legal principles.
    • Non-compliance with natural justice.
    • Conflict with the laws of India.

7. Non-Arbitrable Matters

  • Certain matters like matrimonial disputes, criminal cases, and insolvency are not arbitrable under Indian law.

8. Improper Composition of Arbitral Tribunal

  • If the composition of the tribunal was not in accordance with the arbitration agreement or applicable rules.

9. Deficiency in Award

  • If the award lacks reasoning, as required under Section 31, it can be set aside.

When Does an Award Become Final?

An arbitral award becomes final and binding when:

  • The period for challenging the award under Section 34 has elapsed.
  • No challenge is made within the prescribed time limit, or if a challenge is made but dismissed by the court.

Judicial Interpretation

  • Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): Expanded the scope of “public policy” to include patent illegality.
  • McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. (2006): Clarified that courts cannot modify an arbitral award but can only set it aside.

Conclusion

The arbitral award is a cornerstone of the arbitration process, providing a binding resolution to disputes. However, to ensure fairness and adherence to legal principles, it can be challenged on specific grounds outlined in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. These safeguards maintain the balance between the autonomy of arbitration and the integrity of the legal system.

QUESTION-8- Explain the following : (a) Lien on arbitral award, (b) Effect on Arbitration agreement of the death of parties.

(a) Lien on Arbitral Award

Meaning

A lien on an arbitral award refers to the right of the arbitral tribunal or an arbitrator to retain the award until their fees and expenses are paid by the parties. This ensures that arbitrators are compensated for their services before releasing the award to the disputing parties.

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: While the Act does not explicitly mention the term “lien,” it allows arbitrators to determine their fees under Section 31(8) and provides them the right to demand payment for their services.

Practical Aspects

  • Arbitrators often include a clause in the arbitration agreement or rules specifying that the award will only be released upon settlement of their fees.
  • Institutional arbitration rules like those of the Indian Council of Arbitration (ICA) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) usually provide mechanisms for addressing unpaid fees.

Case Law

  • In Delhi State Industrial Development Corporation v. K.K. Kaura, the Delhi High Court upheld that arbitrators can retain the award until their fees are settled.

Implications of Lien

  1. Enforcement Delay: A lien can delay the enforcement of the arbitral award.
  2. Judicial Intervention: If the parties dispute the arbitrator’s fees, they may approach the court for resolution.

(b) Effect on Arbitration Agreement of the Death of Parties

Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitration agreement does not automatically terminate upon the death of a party unless the agreement specifically states otherwise. The Act upholds the principle of arbitrability of disputes regardless of the status of the original parties.

Key Provisions

  1. Survival of Arbitration Agreement: Section 40 of the Act provides that arbitration agreements survive the death of a party, and the rights and obligations under the agreement can be enforced by or against the legal representatives of the deceased.
  2. Continuity of Proceedings:
    • If arbitration has commenced, the tribunal can continue the proceedings with the legal representatives stepping into the deceased party’s place.
    • If arbitration has not yet commenced, the legal representatives can initiate arbitration.

Impact on Different Scenarios

  • Personal Obligations: If the dispute involves personal obligations (e.g., personal services contracts), the agreement may not survive.
  • Transferable Rights: If the dispute pertains to transferable rights (e.g., property or contracts), the arbitration agreement typically continues to bind the successors.

Case Law

  1. Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr.: Reinforced that arbitration agreements are binding unless explicitly stated otherwise.
  2. Girdharilal v. Hukam Singh: Clarified that arbitration agreements are enforceable by or against successors unless the agreement is of a personal nature.

Suggestions for Arbitration Agreements

  1. Clearly define the scope of obligations in case of the death of a party.
  2. Include clauses regarding successors and legal representatives.

Conclusion

  • A lien on an arbitral award serves as a safeguard for arbitrators to ensure their remuneration but may lead to enforcement delays.
  • The effect of the death of a party on an arbitration agreement largely depends on the nature of the dispute and the agreement’s terms, with most agreements continuing to bind successors. These aspects highlight the importance of clarity and foresight in drafting arbitration agreements.

QUESTION-9- Define Arbitration Agreement. Discuss the essential ingredients of valid arbitration agreement.

Arbitration Agreement: Definition and Essential Ingredients

Definition of Arbitration Agreement

An arbitration agreement is a contract between two or more parties to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than litigation. It is recognized and governed by Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

According to Section 7(1):
“An arbitration agreement is an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which have arisen or which may arise between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not.”

Forms of Arbitration Agreement

  • Clause in a Contract: Included as a part of a broader contract (arbitration clause).
  • Separate Agreement: An independent agreement solely for arbitration.

Essential Ingredients of a Valid Arbitration Agreement

For an arbitration agreement to be valid and enforceable, it must satisfy the following essential ingredients:

1. Agreement Between the Parties

  • There must be a valid agreement between the parties.
  • It must conform to the essentials of a valid contract as per Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, including free consent, lawful object, and consideration.

2. Written Agreement

  • As per Section 7(3), an arbitration agreement must be in writing.
    The agreement can be established through:
    • A document signed by the parties.
    • Exchange of letters, emails, or other means of communication demonstrating agreement.

3. Intent to Arbitrate

  • The parties must have a clear and unequivocal intent to resolve disputes through arbitration.
  • Any ambiguity regarding the intent may render the arbitration agreement unenforceable.

4. Reference to Arbitration

  • The agreement must expressly or impliedly refer to arbitration as the dispute resolution mechanism.
  • Terms like “arbitration,” “arbitral tribunal,” or similar must be included.

5. Arbitrable Disputes

  • The disputes covered by the agreement must be arbitrable under law. Certain disputes, such as criminal matters, matrimonial disputes, and insolvency, are non-arbitrable.
  • There must be a legal relationship between the parties, whether contractual or otherwise.

7. Identification of Disputes

  • The arbitration agreement must specify:
    • Disputes that have already arisen.
    • Disputes that may arise in the future.

8. Neutrality of Arbitrators

  • The agreement must ensure impartiality and independence of arbitrators.

9. Governing Law

  • The agreement may specify the law governing arbitration proceedings (e.g., Indian Arbitration Act or rules of a foreign jurisdiction).

Case Law

  1. K.K. Modi v. K.N. Modi (1998):
    The Supreme Court outlined the characteristics of a valid arbitration agreement, emphasizing clarity, written form, and unequivocal intent to arbitrate disputes.
  2. Jagdish Chander v. Ramesh Chander (2007):
    The Court held that mere reference to arbitration without explicit intent is insufficient to constitute a valid arbitration agreement.
  3. Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India Ltd. (1999):
    The Court clarified that an arbitration agreement can exist even if it does not specify the arbitral tribunal’s constitution.

Importance of a Valid Arbitration Agreement

  • Foundation of Arbitration: Without a valid agreement, arbitration cannot commence.
  • Binding Nature: Ensures the decision of the arbitral tribunal is enforceable.
  • Avoids Litigation: Promotes speedy and cost-effective resolution of disputes.

Conclusion

A valid arbitration agreement is the cornerstone of the arbitration process. By fulfilling the essentials under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, parties can ensure enforceable, fair, and efficient arbitration proceedings. Courts in India have consistently upheld the sanctity of arbitration agreements, provided they adhere to these essential ingredients

QUESTION -10- Explain the following:
(a) Appointment of arbitrator
(b) challenge Procedure
(c) Default of party

(a) Appointment of Arbitrator

Meaning

The appointment of an arbitrator is a crucial step in initiating arbitration. An arbitrator is a neutral third party chosen to resolve disputes between the parties. The process is governed by Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Procedure for Appointment

  1. Agreement Between Parties:
    • The parties are free to agree on the procedure for appointing an arbitrator (Section 11(2)).
    • The number of arbitrators is usually odd (e.g., one or three), as per Section 10.
  2. Default Appointment by Court:
    • If the parties fail to agree, the Chief Justice or a designated authority may appoint the arbitrator upon request (Section 11(6)).
  3. Time Limit:
    • A party can request the court for appointment if the other party fails to appoint within 30 days from the request.
  4. International Commercial Arbitration:
    • For international disputes, the appointment is made by the Supreme Court or an institution designated by it.

Key Case Laws

  • TRF Ltd. v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. (2017): The Supreme Court clarified that a person ineligible to act as an arbitrator cannot nominate another arbitrator.
  • Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. HSCC (India) Ltd. (2019): Reinforced the principle of independence and neutrality in appointments.

(b) Challenge Procedure

Meaning

The challenge procedure allows parties to object to the appointment of an arbitrator based on bias, conflict of interest, or lack of qualification. It is governed by Section 12 and Section 13 of the Act.

Grounds for Challenge

  • Bias or Impartiality: If circumstances give rise to justifiable doubts about the arbitrator’s impartiality or independence (Section 12(3)(a)).
  • Lack of Qualifications: Failure to meet the qualifications agreed upon by the parties (Section 12(3)(b)).

Procedure (Section 13)

  1. Filing the Challenge:
    • A party must raise the challenge within 15 days of becoming aware of the reason.
  2. Decision by the Tribunal:
    • The arbitral tribunal decides the challenge. If rejected, arbitration continues.
  3. Recourse to Court:
    • If dissatisfied, the challenging party can challenge the final arbitral award under Section 34.

Key Case Laws

  • Voestalpine Schienen GmbH v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (2017): Highlighted the importance of maintaining arbitrator neutrality.
  • HRD Corporation v. GAIL (India) Ltd. (2018): Emphasized the criteria for arbitrator disqualification under Section 12(5).

(c) Default of Party

Meaning

Default of a party refers to situations where one of the parties fails to participate in arbitration proceedings, as governed by Section 25 of the Act.

Types of Default

  1. Failure to Submit a Statement of Claim or Defence:
    • If the claimant fails, the tribunal may terminate proceedings (Section 25(a)).
    • If the respondent fails, the tribunal continues without treating it as an admission of the claimant’s allegations (Section 25(b)).
  2. Non-Appearance at Hearings:
    • If a party does not attend hearings, the tribunal can proceed ex parte (Section 25(c)).

Impact of Default

  • The proceedings do not stop solely due to default.
  • The tribunal ensures fair treatment and gives the defaulting party an opportunity to participate at a later stage.

Key Case Laws

  • Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal (1955): Established the principle of proceeding with available evidence in the event of a party’s non-cooperation.
  • Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): Highlighted that procedural fairness should be ensured even in cases of default.

Conclusion

The appointment of arbitrators, the challenge procedure, and the handling of default by a party are integral aspects of arbitration. They ensure the independence and efficiency of the process while maintaining fairness for all parties. Proper adherence to these procedures enhances the credibility and effectiveness of arbitration as a mechanism for dispute resolution.

QUESTION-11- Write short notes on the following:.
(a) Objectives of the ArbitrationandConciliation Act,1996
(b) Domestic Arbitration

(a) Objectives of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was enacted to provide a statutory framework for the resolution of disputes through arbitration and conciliation. The main objectives of the Act are as follows:

  1. Promotion of Arbitration and Conciliation:
    The Act aims to promote arbitration as a preferred method of dispute resolution, offering an alternative to the conventional litigation process. The goal is to make the legal system more efficient and accessible.
  2. Expeditious Resolution of Disputes:
    By providing a quicker, more flexible alternative to court proceedings, the Act ensures that disputes are resolved faster, thereby reducing the burden on courts and promoting the effective resolution of civil disputes.
  3. Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards:
    The Act facilitates the enforcement of international arbitration awards, aligning with the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958). This ensures that India remains a favorable destination for international dispute resolution.
  4. Uniformity in Procedures:
    The Act establishes uniform procedures for arbitration and conciliation, making the process transparent, consistent, and fair. This includes guidelines for the appointment of arbitrators, the conduct of hearings, and the enforcement of awards.
  5. Support for Party Autonomy:
    One of the key features of the Act is to allow the parties to have control over the dispute resolution process. This includes the freedom to agree on the rules of arbitration, the selection of arbitrators, and the venue of the proceedings.
  6. Minimum Court Intervention:
    The Act aims to reduce the role of courts in arbitration proceedings. Courts intervene only in specific situations, such as the enforcement of awards or the challenge of an arbitral award under certain conditions.
  7. Consolidation of Laws:
    The Act consolidates the law relating to arbitration and conciliation, providing clear and comprehensive guidelines for both domestic and international arbitration. It incorporates provisions from the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and UNCITRAL Model Law on Conciliation.

(b) Domestic Arbitration

Domestic arbitration refers to arbitration that takes place within a single country, involving disputes that arise under a domestic legal framework. It involves parties who are from the same country, and the arbitration proceedings and awards are governed by the national laws of that country. In India, domestic arbitration is governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Key Features of Domestic Arbitration:

  1. Parties’ Nationality:
    Both parties in a domestic arbitration are typically from the same country, in contrast to international arbitration, where the parties may belong to different countries.
  2. Arbitration Agreement:
    A domestic arbitration is initiated based on an agreement between the parties, which must be in writing (as per Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996).
  3. Arbitration Process:
    The process for domestic arbitration follows the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It includes the appointment of arbitrators, the conduct of hearings, and the issuance of an arbitral award, with minimal interference from the courts.
  4. Arbitral Award:
    The arbitral award is binding on the parties and enforceable under the Indian law, just like a court judgment. The award can be challenged under Section 34 of the Act on limited grounds, such as issues of procedural fairness or public policy.
  5. Court Intervention:
    Courts have a very limited role in domestic arbitration, intervening only in cases where parties seek assistance in appointing arbitrators, enforcing awards, or challenging an award on limited grounds.
  6. Simplified Procedure:
    The procedure in domestic arbitration is generally less formal than in court trials. This helps in reducing the costs and time associated with resolving disputes.
  7. Confidentiality:
    The arbitration process is private, which is particularly beneficial in sensitive business or commercial disputes.
  8. Scope of Arbitration:
    Domestic arbitration can be used for any civil dispute, except those matters that are non-arbitrable under Indian law, such as criminal cases, matrimonial disputes, and matters relating to insolvency.

Case Law:

  • Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services, Inc. (2012): This case emphasized the importance of party autonomy and the limited scope of court intervention in domestic arbitration.
  • State of West Bengal v. Associated Contractors (2015): The Supreme Court reaffirmed the binding nature of arbitral awards in domestic arbitration, underscoring minimal judicial intervention.

Conclusion:

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a clear and effective framework for domestic arbitration, encouraging an efficient, cost-effective, and quick alternative to court litigation. Domestic arbitration allows parties to resolve disputes privately and efficiently, with minimal interference from courts, ensuring that the arbitration process remains independent and effective.

QUESTION -12- Discuss in detail the grounds:on which an arbitral award can be set aside under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Grounds on which an Arbitral Award can be Set Aside under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a comprehensive framework for resolving disputes through arbitration in India. Once the arbitral process concludes, an arbitral award is issued. However, the Act also provides limited grounds for challenging and setting aside an arbitral award. These grounds are specified under Section 34 of the Act. The role of the courts is restricted, and they are allowed to intervene only in certain circumstances. The primary objective of this limited intervention is to ensure that arbitration remains an effective alternative to court litigation.

Section 34: Grounds for Setting Aside an Arbitral Award

As per Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitral award can be set aside on the following grounds:

1. Lack of Jurisdiction or Incompetence of the Arbitral Tribunal (Section 34(2)(a))

An award can be set aside if the arbitral tribunal exceeds its jurisdiction or acts outside the scope of the arbitration agreement. This includes:

  • Lack of jurisdiction: The tribunal does not have the authority to hear the dispute.
  • Exceeding the scope of the agreement: The tribunal rules on matters that fall outside the terms of the arbitration agreement.
  • Composition of the Tribunal: If the tribunal was not constituted in accordance with the arbitration agreement or the provisions of the Act.

Case Law:

  • Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services (2012): The Supreme Court held that if the arbitral tribunal exceeds its jurisdiction, the award could be challenged under Section 34.

2. Procedural Fairness – Violation of Principles of Natural Justice (Section 34(2)(a)(ii))

An arbitral award may be set aside if the party challenging the award can prove that there was a violation of the principles of natural justice during the arbitration process. This includes:

  • Lack of opportunity to present a case: If one of the parties was not given an opportunity to present their case, such as failure to attend hearings or submit evidence, the award may be challenged.
  • Bias or partiality: If the tribunal was biased, or there was a conflict of interest involving the arbitrators, the award can be challenged.
  • Failure to follow the procedural rules: If the tribunal does not follow the agreed procedures or statutory provisions that affect the fairness of the process.

Case Law:

  • Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Amritsar Gas Service (1991): The Supreme Court observed that if an arbitrator acts in violation of the principles of natural justice, the award can be set aside.

3. Award in Conflict with Public Policy of India (Section 34(2)(b)(ii))

One of the most significant grounds for setting aside an arbitral award is if the award is contrary to the public policy of India. The phrase “public policy” has been interpreted broadly to include considerations of fairness, justice, and the societal interest. The award can be challenged on these grounds if:

  • The award is contrary to the laws of India: If the award contradicts the fundamental principles of law, such as a violation of constitutional or statutory provisions.
  • The award is immoral or illegal: An award that contravenes public morality or the legal norms of the society can be set aside.
  • The award is in violation of the basic notions of justice: For instance, if the award is grossly unjust or the outcome is arbitrary or unreasonable.

Case Law:

  • Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. (1994): The Supreme Court laid down that awards can be set aside if they are contrary to the public policy of India, especially if it violates fundamental legal principles.
  • ONGC Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): The Supreme Court elaborated on the concept of public policy and held that an award that violates public policy can be set aside.

4. Award Not Dealing with All Issues in Dispute (Section 34(2)(a)(iii))

If the arbitral tribunal does not deal with all the issues raised in the arbitration proceedings and fails to provide a decision on them, an award can be set aside. The tribunal must address all the disputes raised by the parties during the proceedings. If an award is incomplete or omits significant issues, it may not be considered a valid award and could be challenged.

5. Incompetence of the Arbitral Award (Section 34(2)(a)(iv))

An arbitral award can be set aside if:

  • The award is arbitrary: If the arbitral tribunal issues an award that is manifestly unjust or irrational, contrary to logic or the facts of the case, the court can intervene.
  • The award is inconsistent with the terms of the arbitration agreement: If the decision made by the arbitral tribunal is in conflict with the agreed-upon terms or instructions in the arbitration agreement.

Case Law:

  • Oil and Natural Gas Corporation v. Saw Pipes Ltd. (2003): The Court held that an award may be set aside if it is found to be arbitrary or unreasonable.

6. Fraud or Corruption (Section 34(2)(b))

If the arbitral award is obtained by fraud, corruption, or undue influence, it can be challenged and set aside under Section 34. This is an important ground to maintain the integrity of the arbitration process. If there is proof that the award was based on fraudulent practices or misconduct by one of the parties or the arbitrator, the award can be challenged.

7. Lack of Arbitrability (Section 34(2)(b))

If the subject matter of the dispute is not arbitrable, the arbitral award can be set aside. Certain matters, such as criminal offenses, matrimonial issues, and insolvency, are generally not arbitrable under Indian law. If the dispute relates to a non-arbitrable issue, the court may set aside the award.

8. Time Limit for Challenging an Award

A party seeking to challenge an arbitral award must do so within three months from the date of receiving the award, as per Section 34(3). The court may extend this period by another 30 days if there are valid reasons for the delay.

Conclusion

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a limited set of grounds on which an arbitral award can be set aside. These grounds are designed to ensure that the arbitral process remains fair, just, and aligned with public policy. Court intervention is generally minimal, ensuring that arbitration is a quick, cost-effective, and binding dispute resolution mechanism. However, to preserve the integrity of the system, challenges based on procedural irregularities, jurisdictional issues, and violations of natural justice are allowed.

Scroll to Top