Constitutional Law-I

Brief Overview

Unit I: Preamble and Citizenship

  • Preamble: Serves as the guiding spirit and philosophy of the Indian Constitution. It declares India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic, highlighting objectives like justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. Courts often use it as an interpretative tool (e.g., Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala).
  • Citizenship: Defined under Articles 5–11. The Constitution initially provided for citizenship at the commencement, while the Citizenship Act, 1955 governs acquisition (by birth, descent, registration, naturalization) and termination (renunciation, termination, deprivation).
  • Article 12 – Definition of ‘State’: Expands the scope of Fundamental Rights by including government bodies and agencies under its purview. Mohammad Raza v. State of Bombay emphasized this inclusive interpretation.
  • Article 13 – Judicial Review & Interpretation: It invalidates pre-constitutional and post-constitutional laws violating Fundamental Rights. It provides the basis for judicial review, as seen in cases like A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras and Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India.

Unit II: Right to Equality

  • Article 14: Guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of laws. Ensures non-arbitrariness in state action (E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu).
  • Articles 15 & 16: Provide for non-discrimination and equality in public employment, respectively, with special provisions for backward classes, women, and children.
  • Reservation Policy: Rooted in Article 15(4) and 16(4). Judicially examined in Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (Mandal Commission Case), which upheld reservations but set a 50% ceiling.
  • Article 19: Enshrines six freedoms including speech, assembly, association, movement, residence, and profession. Subject to reasonable restrictions in public interest.
  • Freedom of Press: Though not expressly mentioned, it is derived from Article 19(1)(a) (Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras).
  • Doctrine of Equality: Used by courts to test classification and arbitrariness in legislation.
  • Interplay of Articles 14–16: Together, these form the equality code, protecting individuals from discrimination while allowing affirmative action.

Unit III: Rights Against Exploitation and Freedom of Religion

  • Article 20: Protects individuals from ex post facto laws, double jeopardy, and self-incrimination.
  • Article 21 – Right to Life and Personal Liberty: Initially interpreted narrowly in A.K. Gopalan, but later expanded in Maneka Gandhi to include dignity, privacy, health, environment, etc.
  • Article 22: Provides protections against arbitrary arrest and preventive detention, including legal aid and production before a magistrate.
  • Articles 23–24: Prohibit human trafficking, forced labor, and child labor in hazardous industries (People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India).
  • Articles 25–28: Guarantee freedom of religion but allow the State to regulate secular aspects. Restrictions include public order, morality, and health (Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt).
  • Article 21’s Evolution: Reflects India’s human rights jurisprudence, expanding personal liberty through judicial activism.

Unit IV: Cultural, Educational Rights, and Remedies

  • Articles 29 & 30: Protect minorities’ rights to conserve culture and establish educational institutions. Clarified in T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka.
  • Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs): Non-justiciable guidelines for governance aimed at social and economic justice. Found in Part IV (Articles 36–51).
  • Article 51A – Fundamental Duties: Though non-enforceable, they promote civic responsibility and national unity. Useful in judicial interpretation (AIIMS Students Union v. AIIMS).
  • Article 32 – Constitutional Remedies: Called the “heart and soul” of the Constitution by Dr. Ambedkar. Allows individuals to approach the Supreme Court directly for violation of Fundamental Rights.
  • Relationship between FRs and DPSPs: Courts have increasingly attempted to harmonize the two (Minerva Mills v. Union of India).
  • Judicial Balance: The judiciary has played a pivotal role in balancing rights and state duties, ensuring neither undermines the other.

Conclusion

The Constitutional Law-I syllabus forms the bedrock of public law in India. It emphasizes the dynamic relationship between individual rights, state power, and judicial oversight. By studying this subject, students understand the Constitution as a living document that adapts through interpretation and evolves with social, political, and moral changes.

Scroll to Top